Overview
A fleet of agents can save time and generate useful options, but it should not be treated as an unquestionable strategic authority.
Several limitations remain:
- Many agents may repeat the same weak assumption.
- Outliers may be hallucinations.
- A debate can become confident without having enough evidence.
- More agents increase token costs.
- Poorly chosen roles can create artificial disagreement instead of useful challenge.
- The synthesis can distort or oversimplify the individual analyses.
The practical use is to trade some money for a large amount of analytical coverage. The output should be treated as a structured set of hypotheses, tests, and candidate decisions. High-impact decisions still require judgment.